Source – Despite being guilty of actual crimes punishable by law, Diddy somehow remained a free man for decades. Despite the mountain of evidence and witness accounts, authorities were always lenient and gave him a pass.
For decades, insistent rumors regarding Diddy’s depraved activities swirled around the entertainment industry.
Many people witnessed unspeakable things, but nearly all kept their mouths shut. And, when questioned specifically about these things, almost all would say: “I can’t talk about it.” And they’re still not really talking about it.
Because revealing what actually happened at these parties would require revealing not only Diddy’s tendencies but also the tendencies of the entire entertainment industry and the elite that controls it.
We’re not merely talking about decadent parties; we’re talking about rape, sex slaves, and pedophilia. Diddy did not invent any of this, but he was overly brazen and enthusiastic.
There were reasons for him to believe this: He was connected with powerful and influential people. More importantly, he had dirt on powerful and influential people—some recorded on video.
This caused him to become even bolder in his actions while also reducing victims and witnesses to silence for fear of being blackballed or worse.
Some of America’s biggest music executives are said to be panicking as a top attorney has warned that high-profile accomplices of Sean “Diddy” Combs will be named in a new wave of accuser suits — and “the names will shock you.”
There is absolutely nothing new about this. Over three years ago, I published an article titled The Bad Boy Records Curse: Why So Many Artists Who Signed With Diddy Became Religious? in which I documented several artists who signed with Diddy and made a 180-degree turn towards religion (to an extreme).
As explained in the article, it wasn’t a coincidence. These people saw things that deeply troubled them spiritually and sought refuge in religion.
Like Jeffrey Epstein, Diddy had considerable wealth and influence, which led him to rub shoulders with top politicians, businessmen, and celebrities. Like Epstein, Diddy hosted gatherings that degenerated into orgies involving a combination of rich and powerful people with heavily drugged sex slaves – male and female.
Under Diddy’s watch, numerous “big names” engaged in activities ranging from the embarrassing to the outright criminal. Many of these encounters were filmed, and whether he knew it or not, Diddy built a massive library of blackmail material.
To quote a Kanye West song, “No one man should have all that power.” That is definitely what his occult elite friends believed. Diddy could not continue owning this material and use it as leverage.
Even worse, this material could be stolen and leaked. Like Epstein, Diddy needed to be neutralized, and all the compromising footage had to be seized.
We’re not merely talking about rappers spilling champagne on video models. Minors were involved. On October 1st, attorney Tony Buzbee launched a lawsuit against Diddy involving 120 victims. The youngest rape victim is nine years old.
Like with Epstein, Diddy’s case could place “important” people in a dire situation. Buzbee stated that the lawsuit will involve many “household names,” including “powerful hotel execs, bankers, and pharmaceutical bosses.”
Like in Jeffrey Epstein’s case, taking down Diddy is a highly delicate task. It needs to be a controlled demolition.
When a building is demolished, it is done through a carefully calculated implosion to make sure the structure collapses on itself without affecting the surrounding buildings.
This is precisely what was done with Epstein and what will be done with Diddy. While some people might get smeared by the “revelations” that are bound to happen in the coming months, the most significant crimes and the most prominent criminals (occult elite pedophiles) will be spared – like in Epstein’s case.
One of the main reasons there needs to be a controlled demolition of Diddy is due to political ties. Diddy did not merely “endorse” a candidate; he’s been on the payroll of the Democratic Party for decades. It is not a good look.
