data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17702/1770298536f91e19cbeb6b5e04db4185510f27d5" alt="_1671907231808"
12/24/2022
The Twitter Files Part 9: TWITTER AND “OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” – Post 13
Often intelligence came in the form of brief reports, followed by long lists of accounts simply deemed to be pro-Maduro, pro-Cuba, pro-Russia, etc.
This one batch had over 1000 accounts marked for digital execution:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad96d/ad96d1b5b5898e2e7566cb0089e31845e7bbb517" alt=""
One report says a site “documenting purported rights abuses committed by Ukrainians” is directed by Russian agents:
Intel about the shady origin of these accounts might be true. But so might at least some of the information in them – about neo-Nazis, rights abuses in Donbas, even about our own government. Should we block such material?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38b0c/38b0cce8a7dfb84b6c420ee7de9eef591d4831e4" alt=""
This is a difficult speech dilemma. Should the government be allowed to try to prevent Americans (and others) from seeing pro-Maduro or anti-Ukrainian accounts?
Source: Matt Tabbi
© CopyRights RawNews1st