Idaho’s bill to require a firing squad as a method of execution when lethal injection is unavailable is now headed to the governor’s desk after a 24-11 vote Monday in the Senate.
The reason for bringing the bill, according to the original sponsor, Rep. Bruce Skaug, R-Nampa, is because Idaho is currently unable to obtain the drugs needed to carry out a death sentence by lethal injection. The firing squad would only be an option when lethal-injection drugs are unattainable.
The House approved the bill March 3 by a vote of 50-15-5.
In the Senate debate over the bill, many argued that another method should be considered. Some called it inhumane. Some said there “is a better way.” According to the floor sponsor of the bill, Sen. Doug Ricks, R-Rexburg, there was no debate about an alternative method to the firing squad.
Sen. Melissa Wintrow, D-Boise, said a firing squad is barbaric, and Idaho lawmakers must have some type of restraint when making decisions for the state.
“I’m not arguing justice, I’m arguing how we bring justice about. And we, as a state, need to practice some type of restraint,” Wintrow said.
Sen. Dan Foreman, R-Moscow, said lethal injection is quiet, and the firing squad amounts to a “horror show.” Some senators even commented on how traumatic a firing squad could be for the people who are performing an execution — and how the state would have to take care of those involved.
Others said the bill isn’t about the death penalty — it’s about being able to carry out Idaho law.
Sen. Abby Lee, R-Fruitland, said lawmakers have the ability to make this as quick and professional as possible while still trying to uphold the death penalty.
“We are looking at an alternative method to carry out our current policy. That is all we are being asked,” Lee said.
Sen. Ben Adams, R-Nampa, said he doesn’t love the idea of the state executing people, but following through with the death penalty gives victims and the public more trust in the justice system.
Full Link ( Here )
© CopyRights RawNews1st
